the taking of Ying, 'or that he even went there at all.

Moreover, as we know that Wu Yuan and Po Pcei both took part in the expedition, and also that its success was largely due to the dash and enterprise of 93 E53 Fu Kai, Ho Lu’s younger brother, it is not easy to see how. yet another general could have played a very prominent part in the same campaign.

[3% :er % Ch‘én Chen-sun of the Sung dynasty has the note: 1 —

Military writers look upon Sun Wu as the father of their art. But the fact that he does not appear in the T50 C/zucm, although he is said to have served under Ho Lil King of Wu, makes it uncertain what period he really belonged to. 2

He also says: —— The works of Sun Wu and Wu Ch‘i may be of genuine antiquity. 3

It is noticeable that both Yeh Shui—hsin and Ch‘én Chen-sun, while rejecting the personality of Sun Wu as he figures in Ss'u-ma Ch‘ien’s history, are inclined to ac- cept the date traditionally assigned to the work which passes under his name. The author of the Hsii Lu fails to appreciate this distinction, and consequently his bitter attack on Ch‘én Chén-sun really misses its mark. He makes one or two points, however, which certainly tell in favour of the high antiquity of our “13 chapters.” “Sun Tzu,” he says, “must have lived in the age of Ching Wang [519—476], because he is frequently plagiarised in -

subsequent works of the Chou, Ch‘in and Han dynasties.”