tinctures, first, second, sixth dilutions, &c, while others use hundred thousandths and millionths.

Some homoeopathists of the present day still believe with Hahnemann that, even after the material medicinal particles of a drug have been subdivided to the fullest extent, the continuation of the dy namization or trituration or succession develops a spiritual curative agency, and that the higher the potency, the more subtle and more powerful is the curative action. Hahnemann says (Organon, 3rd American edition, p 101), “ It is only by means of the spiritual influence of a morbinc agent that our spiritual vital power can be diseased, and in like manner only by the spiritual operation of medicine can health be restored ” his is absolutely denied by others. Thus there exist two schools among the adherents of homoeopathy On the one hand there are the Hahnemannians, the “ Purists ” or “ High Potency ” men, who still profess to regard the Organon as their Bible,

ho behcve in all the teachings of Hahnemann, who adhere

in their prescriptions to the single dose, the single medicine, and the highest possible potency, and regard the doctrine of the spiritual dynamization acquired by trituration and succession as indubitable On the other side there are the “ Rational ” or “Low Potency ” men, who believe in the universality of the law of cure, but think that it cannot always be applied, on account of an imperfect materia medica and a lack of knowledge on the part of the physician They believe that in many cases of severe and acute pain palliatives are required, and that they are free to use all the adjutants at present known to science for the relief of suffering humanity-massage, balneology, electricity, hygiene, &c. The American Institute of Homoeopathy the national body of the United States, has adopted the following resolution and ordered it to be published conspicuously in each number of the Transactions of the society: " A homoeopathic physician is one who adds to his knowledge of medicine a special knowledge of homoeopathic therapeutics. All that pertains to the great field of medical learning is his by tradition, by inheritance, by right.”

It is claimed that the effect produced upon both the laity and the general profession of medicine by the introduction of homoeopathy w as salutary in many ways. It diminished the quantity of medicine that was formerly considered necessary for the eradication ot disease and thus revealed the fact that the Us medm1t11a vtaturae is often sufficient, with occasional and gentle assistance, to cure many diseases, especially those fevers that run a definite and regular course. Corroboration of the law szmzlta szmzlzbtzs curenturis seen, according to homoeopathists, in the adoption of the serum therapy, which consists in the treatment of the most malignant diseases (diphtheria, lock-jaw, uphoid fe er, tul-erculosis, bubonic plague) by introducing into the system a modified form (similar) of those poisons that produce them in the healthy inrlixidual. Hahncmann undoubtedly deserv es the credit of being the first to break decidedly ith the old school of medical practice, in which, forgetful of the teachings of Hippocrates, nature was either overlooked or rudely opposed by wrong and uugentle methods We can scarcely now cstimate the force of character and of courage which was implied in his abandoning the common lines of medicine More than this, he and his followers showed results in the treatment of discase which compared very favourably l'l'l the results of contemporary orthodox practice. make a first dcclmal dilution or first decimal tllturation, IO drops of th< mother tincture, or 10 grams of a < rude substance, are mixed with oo drops of alcohol, or 90 grams of sactharum tactts (sugar of milk) rt spectlvcly. 'lhc liquid is thoroughly shaken, or the powder carelull triturated, and the bottlcs conrainin them marked I X, meaning first decimal dilution or trituratlon. To make the 2 X potent y, I0 drops or Io grams of this first dilution oi trituration are mixed with 90 drops of purc alcohol, or 90 grams of milk sugar, and are succussed or trituiated as above dcscribcd, and marked 2 X dilution or trituration This subd1 lsion of particles may be continued to an mdcftmte dcgrce On tne Hahnemannxan or centesunal scale the uicdicmcs are prc pared in the same manner, the difference being that 1 drop or grain is mixed with Q9 drops or grams, to make the first centesmal, l1Ll'l lb marked I c or 1 simply, and so on for the second and higher dilutions.

Homoeopathy has given prominence to the therapeutical side of medicine, and has done much to stimulate the study of the physiological action of drugs It has done service in directing more special attention to various powerful drus, such as aconite, nux vomica, belladonna, and to the advantage of giving them in simpler forms than were common before the days of Hahnemann But in the medical profession homoeopathy nevertheless remains under the stigma of being a dissenting sect. It has been publicly announced that if the homoeopathists would abolish the name “ homoeopathy ” and remove it from their periodicals, colleges, hospitals, dispensaries and asylums, they would be received within the fold of the regular profession These conditions have been accepted by a few homoeopathists who have become members of the most prominent medical association in the United States.

Homoeopathy as it exists to-day can, in the opinion of its adherents, stand by itself, and its progress for a century in face of prolonged and determined opposition appears to its upholders to be evidence of its truth. There are still, indeed, in both schools of medical thought, men who stand fast by their old principles. There are homoeopathists who can see nothing but evil in the practice of their brothers of the orthodox school, as there are allopathists who st1ll regard homoeopathy as a humbug and a sham. There are. however, liberal-minded men in both schools, who look upon the adoption of any safe and efficient method of curing disease as the birthright of the true physician, and who allow every man to prescribe for his patients as his conscience may dictate, and, provided he be educated in all the collateral branches of medical science, are ready to exchange views for the good of suffering humanity Great Brttam.-Honioeopathy is not rapidly extending in Great Britain, and its recognition has been slow. The first notice taken of the new system of therapeutics was by the Medical Society of London in 1826. In 1827 the physician of Prince Leopold of Saxe-Coburg, Dr F. H. F. Quin (1799-1878), who had previously studied homoeopathy in Germany and practised it in Italy, came to England, and it was through his efforts that the system was introduced. Three other physicians, Dr Belluomini, Dr Romani and Dr Tagliani, claimed priority, but careful research established Dr Quin's title. Quin was a successful man professionally and socially, and brought upon himself in a short time the anathema of the Royal College of Physicians. In 1844 Dr William Henderson, professor of pathology in the university of Edinburgh, embraced the Hahnemanntan system. A storm of opposition arose, and Professor ]. Y. Simpson (t e discoverer of chloroform anaesthesia) published a volume, with the alliterative title, Homoeopathy, tts Tenets and Tendenctes, Theorettcal, Theologtcal, and Therapeutzcal. This brochure was answered by Professor Henderson, the title of his book being Homoeopathy Fairly Represented. From 1827 to 1837 there were but a dozen practitioners of homoeopathy in London, but during 1837 to 1847 the number increased to between seventy and eighty. In 1857 there were upwards of two hundred practitioners in the kingdom, with thirty three institutions in which the law of similars was uscd as a basis of practice In 1867 the increase was not so rapid, the number being 261. A society was formed about this period for “ the protection of homoeopathic practitioners and students, " which proved of great value in binding the sect together in 1870 congresses were established, and annual mcettugs held, which have contlr ued to the present time. In 1901 there were over three hundred homoeopathic physicians in the British Isles, of from between seventy and eighty were in London alone There were sew enty-nine chemists, of whom seventeen wcre located in London, and eighty-two towns and cities in the country contained from one to ten homoeopathic practitioners each, together with many established chemists for dispensing homoeopathic medicines. The British Homoeopathir Society was founded by Quin in 1844, and has numerous members and fellows, besides corresponding members in all poi tions of the world, including Australia, Incha and Tasmania The London Homoeopathic Hospital was founded in 1850, also largely through the efforts of Quin, and.a few years afterwards moved to Great Ormond Street During the cholera epidemic of 1854 the statistics of this hospital showed a mortality of 16-4 %, against 51'8 “O of other metropohtan charities. The London Homoeopathic Hospital has a convalescent home under its management at Eastbourne. There are also dispensaries in Ealing and West l/llddlcsex, Kensington, Notting llill and Bayswater. Similar institutions are located in Bath, Birkenhead, Birmingham, Bootle, Bournemouth, Brighton, Bristol, Bromley, Cheltenham, Cheshire, Croy don, Dublin, hastbourne, Edinburgh, Folkestone, Hastings and St Leonards, Ipswich, Leeds, Leicester, Liverpool, Newcastle, Northampton, Norwich, ()ford, Plymouth, Torquay, Tunbridge Wells, Weston super-Mare l'he homoeopathic journals

include the Homoeopathtc World, the London Homoeopathtc Hospital