|
Notes
Note 1, p. 192. The Touch is made sensible...and hence its name, &c.] The text refers to etymology to shew, that as, in all times, it had been noticed that the impression upon other senses is different from that upon Touch, it had hence obtained its appellation ἁφή, which, being derived from ἅπτω, (to fasten or bind,) signifies fastening or binding, and so (by touching,) immediate contact; as contact is necessary for the sensation of Touch. This may suffice for the explanation of the term in the original, but it may not, of course, be applicable to its synonym in a modern language, since its origin may be from another idea, and, therefore, a different root.
Note 2, p. 192. And yet the other sentient organs, &c.] It had been proved analogically, that, as bodies in the water are separated by the water, (as was supposed to be proved by their extremities being wet,) so bodies in the air are separated by air, and therefore, that, as no one body is in immediate contact with another body, sensation can be effected only through a medium; and this was supposed to hold good even for the Touch. Thus, the medium, acted upon and acting in its turn, reduces all sensual impressions to the one impression by contact, and this generalisation is supported by some modern writers and regarded as the theory of Sensation. "There[1] may, however, be many other impressions derived from outward bodies, for which the sensitive nerves of the lower animals are adapted, besides those which affect us, and we cannot always be certain of the identity of the feelings communicated to them by organs which appear analogous to our own."
Note 3, p. 193. On which account, other sentient, &c.] This is consonant with the opinion that the Touch is the only sense necessary to animal existence; although the organs of relation are required for the higher forms of being. Thus, impressions in excess upon those organs, whether by colour, sound, or odour, may injure or pervert the senses, but cannot further affect the individual; while tangible impressions, hot, cold, or hard, can together with the sense destroy the animal.
Note 4, p. 193. Animals, in fact, possess...the other senses, &c.] This is referrible, of course, only to the higher orders of animals, as they alone require such organs for the exercise of their faculties, and the enjoyment of their existence. The Tongue is here introduced, whether by inadvertence or in submission to common opinion, as if it were a sense, or the sole organ for speech; and yet, as the chief of the organs for taste and speech, it may be said to constitute one of the distinguishing features of humanity. As no creature, however, is without a tongue, it can scarcely be supposed to be wanting, and yet, as it would not seem to be so essential as some other parts, life might, perhaps, for a time, be maintained without it. But speech is, of course, nowise necessary to life, as the learned commentator observes: "Nam etiam linguæ sermone, si vitam, detractis ornamentis, ad necessitatis angustias redigere velis, vitæ conservatio carere potest."
- ↑ Grant's Outlines, p. 248.