2
blockchain.info hosts encrypted wallets, and all decryption is done locally, so having a Google Authenticator bound to a wallet only prevents an attacker from downloading that encrypted wallet.
Now, assuming the passphrase is good, having an encrypted wallet is perfectly useless if you do not know the passphrase.
So the two-factor authentication would provide any benefit only to people with non-good passphrases... but that wouldn't be a real solution: they ought to change passphrase anyway!
Hence, I can't come up with any situation were enabling two-factor authentication on blockchain.info provides any meaningful benefit.
Am I missing something?
But... you are not addressing the concerns I posted, this is a generic answer which I don't need. – o0'. – 2013-04-12T10:12:59.143
1@Lohoris The question you are asking is a generic question - you're asking about the worth of TFA when a passphrase is "good". The application to blockchain.info specifically doesn't really change the question. – fbrereto – 2013-04-12T23:10:13.613
Yes it does: in a traditional website you have a login+password without which you can't login at all, and TFA provides an additional layer. In blockchain.info AFAIK knowing a wallet id is enough to download it, but the wallet itself is protected by the passphrase, so if you don't know that, having the wallet isn't useful. – o0'. – 2013-04-13T14:33:55.093