0
According to wiki, if we had m generals, than we need 2m+1 to meet consensus. So it's about 66.6% + 1 generals
But what the reason to use consensus like BFT? Why we can't get result of the most (50% + 1) generals to meet consensus?
0
According to wiki, if we had m generals, than we need 2m+1 to meet consensus. So it's about 66.6% + 1 generals
But what the reason to use consensus like BFT? Why we can't get result of the most (50% + 1) generals to meet consensus?