1
In Satoshi Nakamoto's diagram:
The line coming from transaction block 1 and going the the "Hash" label in transaction block 2 appears to represent the hash of the entire transaction block (Owner 1's Public Key + Hash + Owner 0's Signature) rather than represent the Hash value shown in transaction block 1 (in which case the line should (technically) be attached to the Hash block rather than to the border of the transaction block). Can anyone confirm exactly how the Hash value shown is computed and whether or not it contains the previous owner's signature?

Awesome, thanks. So when the transaction block does not contain the signature, does the hash of transaction block 2 contain a reference to the computed has of transaction block 1 (i.e., specifically the hash of owner 1's public key + the previous hash)? According to the diagram, nothing other than public key is being hashed unless the signature is included. Is the diagram largely abstracted? Is there a spec I can see that shows exactly what gets hashed--segwit or otherwise? – Jazimov – 2018-05-22T12:58:13.063
The diagram is largely abstract and does not contain what is actually being hashed. A more specific explanation can be found in BIP 144: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0144.mediawiki#hashes
– Andrew Chow – 2018-05-22T16:13:07.653