How do bech32 addresses compare to P2SH addresses in transaction size?

Bech32 (starts with bc1) and P2SH (starts with 3) can both be used for segwit transactions. I know bech32 is supposed to create smaller transactions, but I'd like to know how much smaller (than P2SH). How do transactions coming from a normal single-key address compare?

B T

Posted 2017-12-19T23:12:56.470

Reputation: 1 134

Answers

bech32 produces smaller transactions than P2SH segwit transactions.

one extra byte per output to create P2SH outputs than to create bech32 utxos (P2SH uses OP_HASH160 and OP_EQUAL in addition to a 20 byte hash in its script, whereas bech32 just uses a fixed 00 byte in addition to a 20 byte hash), and
23 extra bytes per input to spend from P2SH utxos than from bech32 utxos (P2SH has to produce the script that was hashed when spending in the sigscript, which takes 23 bytes to encode - bech32 has no non-witness sigscript at all).

Basically P2SH requires a script hash, native SegWit doesn't, and everything else is much the same. Native SegWit provides the script when the output is created, and P2SH provides it when the output is spent.

Chris Moore

Posted 2017-12-19T23:12:56.470

Reputation: 13 952

See discussion here: https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/80a4zl/bitcoin_utxo_has_been_reduced_by_10_in_one_month/duu91c9/

– Chris Moore – 2018-02-26T13:57:45.193

https://bitcoincore.org/en/segwit_wallet_dev/#why-and-how-to-use-native-p2wpkh-and-p2wsh says "Comparing with the P2SH versions, the transaction vsize of native versions is smaller in most cases". – Chris Moore – 2018-02-26T14:47:29.107

They are both just an encoding. The resulting tx could be exactly identical. In real life however people use bech32 just fur native segwit transactions, while p2sh is used as a wrapper around segwit. the tx is actually a tiny bit smaller when using p2sh.

blues

Posted 2017-12-19T23:12:56.470

Reputation: 276

2Oh really? P2SH is actually smaller? What's the advantage of bech32 then? I don't quite understand what "native" means in the context of "native segwit". By the way, do you have sources where we could read more about this / verify your answer? – B T – 2017-12-26T23:24:52.507

The best source is always the actual source. bech32 have been proposed in bip173 which you can find here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0173.mediawiki It also has a section on how bech32 is better than different encodings. For the size there is no definite source without specifying what exactly you want to compare. bech32 is an encoding, p2sh is a type of transaction. For my comparison I assumed that bech32 is equivalent to native segwit.

– blues – 2017-12-31T23:56:05.783