1
I'm new to cryptocurrencies, so I recently read the paper from the Satoshi Nakamoto ( link is here ) to know a little bit more about the Bitcoin.And I saw this statement:
What is needed is an electronic payment system based on cryptographic proof instead of trust, allowing any two willing parties to transact directly with each other without the need for a trusted third party. Transactions that are computationally impractical to reverse would protect sellers from fraud, and routine escrow mechanisms could easily be implemented to protect buyers. In this paper, we propose a solution to the double-spending problem using a peer-to-peer distributed timestamp server to generate computational proof of the chronological order of transactions. The system is secure as long as honest nodes collectively control more CPU power than any cooperating group of attacker nodes.
So my questions would be:
- Could a large botnet disrupt/hack the whole cryptocurrency system if the botnet currently holds more CPU power than the friendly nodes?
- If yes,would it be feasible at all and or worth the work?
I may understood this whole idea wrongly, so any tips, advice is appreciated!
111 million THps / 14 THps = 785,714 miners. 785714 miners * $2000 each => 1.57 billion dollars – morsecoder – 2017-11-20T20:40:40.877
He has to control only half of 11 million. Actually if all current nodes are honest, he should buy another 11 million to control >50%. – croraf – 2017-11-20T20:42:53.977
2@croraf It's not like if you add 5.5 million TH/s then an existing 5.5 million goes away. To get 51% of the hashpower by adding new mining hardware you would have to add just more than is already there. Even if that was right it would be 785 million, not 400 million – morsecoder – 2017-11-20T20:45:57.937
@StephenM347 corrected. – croraf – 2017-11-20T20:48:52.340