1
Assume a hypothetical situation where a researcher was able to develop a computer capable of 2,000 PH/s (the current network hashrate). During his first 2 weeks of mining, he would strike it rich as he would win 50% of block generations with 5 minutes per block.
After 2 weeks, the difficulty target would readjust, and this miner would no longer have an advantage.
However, for this next 2 week period, the miner sits out, waits 2 more weeks, and allows the network to re-adjust back to a higher target, at which point he re-enters and sweeps the rewards once more.
He repeats this cycle in perpetuity.
A solo miner with 2,000 PH/s seems infeasible, but what if a powerful mining pool were to pull this stunt — withdraw from mining for 2 weeks, allow for the difficulty target to re-adjust, and re-enter with a much easier difficulty?
I think you're mistaken. If the miner's own hash rate is equal to the combined rate of the rest of the network, that miner will on average take half the blocks, regardless of how the difficulty changes. Also, keep in mind that difficulty changes by at most a factor of 2 each 2016 blocks (if I recall correctly), so there won't be swings as dramatic as you seem to be suggesting. – Nate Eldredge – 2016-09-03T05:30:07.117
The maximum change is a factor 0.25 or 4. – Pieter Wuille – 2016-09-03T08:58:34.520