10
2
Am I correct that in not having our private keys written in paper or otherwise backed up we are implicitly trusting the wallet developers to keep publishing wallet versions that are capable of reading and deciphering our password-phrase? Nobody else can decypher that phrase and give us access to the bitcoins, correct?
I recently had a bad experience with Mycellium wallet: i lost my Android mobile and the backup of my wallet was in a 1-year-old format (encrypted private key in paper, QR format) that the new desktop app, amazingly, would not recognise. In the meanwhile, I had moved to iPhone, where no Mycelium was available. Eventually i solved the issue by installing Mycelium in a friend's Android. Fortunately, the Android version did recognize the old encryption after scanning the QR with the camera, so I could send the money to another wallet. But this made me realise that we absolutely rely on the developers if we do not keep the private keys written somewhere, unencrypted.
In other words: What happens if a wallet app is discontinued and we find ourselves in 2020 with no way to install that old wallet in the 2020 standard devices?
Or am i missing something here?
Thanks in advance
So you would not recommend using wallets that do not allow exporting the private key unencrypted? (i'm having this problem with GreenAddress) – DrGC – 2016-01-06T23:18:50.843
1@DrGC I wouldn't recommend them for long-term storage of significant amounts of money. – David Schwartz – 2016-01-06T23:56:31.010
Probably best to use BIP 38 encrypted paper wallets for long-term cold storage, especially if printer drivers not trusted. However, be aware that not all hot wallets can directly sweep nor import BIP 38 encrypted paper wallets. To avoid wallet vendor lockin, BIP 39 technology is also an excellent technology for the long term to easily backup and restore your funds in a HD wallet. . – skaht – 2016-01-08T06:16:32.543