3
In Proof-of-Work, a block hash is costly to manipulate (say, wanting the hash to be even, or have the hash of the hash smaller than some number) since there is a lot of computing power put into selecting the right header to produce a valid hash.
I'm wondering - are the block hashes in the various Proof-of-Stake implementations easier to manipulate since the hashes aren't bound by PoW mining? Could a PoS miner spend some computational time to generate many valid blocks and pick one to use, or are there some other constrains preventing block hash fudging?
Does that affect security of blocks/blockchain in PoS systems? Changing a particular block hash, would require recalculating the hashes of blocks on top of it - no? – Albert s – 2016-12-24T01:29:36.650
1This is called "stake grinding" and demolishes the security of PoS systems. – Anonymous – 2016-12-27T21:20:13.673