6
2
I have read about cryptocurrencies and am very excited by many. I have read that one of the worries and constant debates is Proof of Work vs Proof of State with respect to securing the validity of the blockchain, especially within Ethereum.
I wondered why we would not just combine the two. For example, the first block validated by PoW, second block by PoS, third by PoW, etc. As each block depends on the previous a 51% attack would be a lot more difficult and power consumption significantly reduced.
Is there an obvious problem with doing that?
Can you explain how you got that last formula? And also, isn't a '51% attack' a little vague? With 51% of the mining power, you can do a few different types of attacks given that you have that amount of mining power. What could you do with W, S such that
1/((1/S + 1/W)/2) > 0.5? – morsecoder – 2014-11-13T23:15:57.143@ Nick ODell, I'm curious about your answer to this question. Could you look at my last comment? – morsecoder – 2014-11-17T03:35:18.010