3
It's been several days in a row that I go to dustcoin and see Dogecoin being listed as less profitable than either Digitalcoin and BBQcoin, with the latest being the most profitable.
But then if I go to coinwarz I see the inverse: Dogecoin is the most profitable, next Digital and finally BBQ.
The prices listed for them are not that different, nor is the difficulty - below the values. E.g. the values at the time of writing this question - first columns are from coinwarz and then the values for dustcoin:
coin vs. BTC diff. vs. BTC diff.
BBQ 0.000048 (Cryptsy) 4.3986 0.00005165 3.192
DGC 0.00036494 (Cryptsy) 11.3679 0.00035000 8.062
DOGE 0.00000031 (Coins-E) 286.6240 0.00000028 271.845
I would've thought that getting the profitability would be a straight away calculation, given the hashpower at your disposal vs. the avg. reward for a coin, plus the difficulty of it's network and the value it commands on the market.
So I can't explain why each site gives the exact opposite answer for these coins in particular - my inner cynic suggests at least one of them gets paid to artificially increase/decrease the profitability of some coins, but I find that hard to accept as well.
Any ideas?
See also http://altcoin.pl - jet another dynamic list with profitable of coins
– None – 2014-04-29T17:41:29.697Works, though I find it's interface a bit too... Spartan, so to say. "Minimalist" would call it others - probably I'm too spoiled by seeing the 2 I wrote about too much :) – Joe Pineda – 2014-04-30T04:05:19.830
i wish there's a report button on dustcoin.com obviously the result are not tele with the current market except btc and ltc. For example, peercoin. You can see that the block number are 3 months behind the latest block found. I dun think it is a mistake, i think it is designed to mislead ppl. – None – 2014-09-24T14:37:30.130