The transaction you are looking at is transaction 7dd8efe094e11c890eea7dc65e9bc7fb44903ed3e9b856e854d7d31e247ea1f2. This string is the hex encoded SHA256 hash of the transaction itself and serves as a unique identifier (each transaction has its unique hash).
The left column lists the input addresses from which the bitcoins where claimed, i.e., the "sending" addresses. An address is a base58 encoded string, comprising the network identifier (1 for Bitcoin Mainnet), the 20 byte hash of the public key and a 4 byte checksum. As you can see the address 1AqTMY7kmHZxBuLUR5wJjPFUvqGs23sesr shows up twice because we reference a specific output to be spent. That address has received some coins in two different transactions and now we merge them into this transaction. Next to each input is the value it contributed to the transaction and a link to the output being spent.
On the right side you have similar information for the outputs this transaction creates: a destination address and the amount of coins that are destined to that address.
So this transaction claims coins from 5 outputs (for a total of 109.32071408 BTC) on the left and redistributes the coins to the new outputs on the right (also totalling 109.32071408 BTC). Each output is associated with an address and a value.
Since the sum of inputs minus the sum of outputs is 0, there is no fee attached to this transaction.
Finally the $1453 is the dollar value of the outputs destined for the address page you were looking at at the time. This number is how many bitcoins were transferred to/from this address (1AqTMY7kmHZxBuLUR5wJjPFUvqGs23sesr) as part of this transaction.
but why wouldn't the right side just be 1 address? I can understand when sending bitcoin from your wallet it can come from multiple addresses, but why would it go into many different ones? it should just be just the one your sending to. – Patoshi パトシ – 2014-01-23T17:21:24.207
You're wrong that nobody has the private keys for the right-hand addresses. Somebody does, just not the sender. If nobody had the private keys for the right hand addresses, this would be like flushing $88,117 down the drain. – ChrisW – 2014-01-24T01:43:54.820
duckx, transactions do not work in a such way. There are no addresses with balances under the hood. It is high level abstraction. Each transaction has input and output. You are working only with them. For example: you receivce 2 BTC to addr1 (with single transaction). Now you want to send me 0.5 BTC. You must create transaction, that use output of 2 BTC as input, and has 2 outputs: 0.5 BTC for me, and 1.5 BTC - to you (as remainder). It can be the same address, or any other address from your wallet. Bitcoin-qt uses new address. Look at bitcoin wiki for details about how transactions work. – Zergatul – 2014-01-24T10:51:47.240
ChrisW, I described this case as a special case. Of course, in the most cases someone has private key. – Zergatul – 2014-01-24T10:53:24.780