1
Am I correct that addresses are hashed to compress a huge text-represented coprime into something of manageable size?
Am I also correct that transactions are hashed for the same reason and also because:
To create RSA signature keys, generate an RSA key pair containing a modulus N that is the product of two large primes, along with integers e and d such that e d ≡ 1 (mod φ(N)), where φ is the Euler phi-function. The signer's public key consists of N and e, and the signer's secret key contains d.
To sign a message m, the signer computes σ ≡ md (mod N). To verify, the receiver checks that σe ≡ m (mod N).
As noted earlier, this basic scheme is not very secure. To prevent attacks, one can first apply a cryptographic hash function to the message m and then apply the RSA algorithm described above to the result.
?
I cannot find a reason for blocks being hashed except to slow the rate that transactions are verified thus new supply is mined. Is this correct? If not, why are blocks hashed?
I'd say "no" to all 3, which means you may want to read more about how Bitcoin works... – Meni Rosenfeld – 2013-12-18T18:34:03.450
@MeniRosenfeld Thank you for looking Meni Rosenfeld! Would you mind posting some links so that I can learn more? I've tried to read everything I can, but I can't seem to find explicit motivations for each individual technology. Thank you so very much in advance! – None – 2013-12-18T18:56:48.643