25
13
I understand the idea behind 'bid walls', but on Kraken, prices are being kept low through the use of 'sell walls'. The volume on this exchange is too low to have a chance of getting through these walls, even when prices on other exchanges are skyrocketing. Every so often, when the price falls a bit, up comes a new 'buy wall' keeping it there. The price on Kraken falls when other markets fall, but gets stopped at the wall on the way back up. I am curious to know what the strategy behind this tactic could be.

Added 21 Nov for elucidation
On this small volume exchange, a 30 BTC ask equals 10% of the 24hr. volume. It is the equivalent of a 4500 BTC ask on Bitstamp. It alters the way bidders approach the market. When you see such a wall sitting just above the current price, you can be sure the price will not be rising beyond it for at least the next few hours.
I watched this person re-position this block four times over the course of the day. Each time, lowering it to sit just above the current bid price. It was altering the dynamics of this small volume exchange.
I am not asking for you to read anyone’s mind. I was baffled by this behavior. I had not seen this strategy before. I thought that there must be some method to this madness, but I could not see what I might be. I thought that somewhere in the collective experiences of Stack Exchange there might be someone who was familiar with this strategy and might be able to provide some insight, not necessarily on this person’s behavior, but on the theory behind the strategy being employed. Assuming, of course, that there is one.
I think you're missing something fundamental here. These walls don't come from the exchange or from an individual person or source, they're the cumulative result of the actions of everyone trading (speculating) on that exchange. There's no one strategy that leads to or explains bid and ask walls. You're thinking micro when the problem is macro. – David Perry – 2013-11-19T22:26:28.700
1Thank you for taking the time to write a reply, but you seem to have missed the point entirely. I am not asking about the origin of the wall. I am asking if there is a known strategy that involves keeping the price from climbing by placing an ask order at more than 60 times the mean trade volume at the just above current bid price. Such a disproportionate ask order that suddenly appears, then vanishes and reappears moments later at a new price is not the work of spontaneous generation or the natural result of cumulative actions as you seem to be suggesting. – James Sheils – 2013-11-20T08:25:16.807
@DavidPerry: It could be the work of an individual person: a single large investor who decides, for whatever reason, that she wants to unload a bunch of coins all at once. If she changes her mind a few times about what price she wants, you'll see the wall move around. I don't see why this should suggest that she's trying to affect the larger market in some way; she might just want to make a big trade. But there could be something I'm missing. – Nate Eldredge – 2013-11-20T14:22:00.987
1@NateEldredge: True, but it still remains that at worst this question misunderstands fundamental concepts and at best it's asking us to be mind-readers. – David Perry – 2013-11-20T19:20:30.407
related: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/2944/what-is-a-bid-wall
– Murch – 2013-11-21T10:04:07.410Further investigation leads me to believe that this wall could have been providing insurance to support a short position. A risky strategy, but do-able considering the unique opportunities possible due to the dynamics of this low-volume exchange. Of course, since the volume is so low the ROI would also be pretty low. Thanks for your help. – James Sheils – 2013-11-21T10:07:01.457