6
2
I recently open Bitcoin Pie, a site that compares crypto-currencies.
Given the exchange rate in BTC, I would like to add another column that tells "relative mining profitability", regardless of the hardware used.
So, if at a given moment, BTC mines at difficulty X, NMC at Y, and FooCoin at Z, with the conversion rates to BTC being 1, N_BTC, and F_BTC respectively, just comparing X, Y*N_BTC, and Z*F_BTC should give an indication of which one a rational miner should mine.
What is a good number to use in the difficulty column? Where are the APIs for it? Is it just plain "difficulty", or is it some other number?
I'm not sure how to take merged Namecoin mining into account here. Any ideas?
CPU and GPU coins should not be measured on the same scale.
This might be very related, I wouldn't call it an exact duplicate though: http://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/118/how-much-bitcoin-will-i-mine-right-now-with-hardware-x
– ripper234 – 2011-10-09T17:48:00.730its a cool idea – osmosis – 2011-10-10T00:13:49.763
Note that the comparison doesn't work for Tenebrix because it uses scrypt. I like the idea, but it will only be useful until merged mining is available – nmat – 2011-10-10T03:28:10.510
@namt - merged mining of NMC & BTC is available. I added a separation between "CPU coins" and "GPU coins". – ripper234 – 2011-10-10T05:09:11.477
The comparison would still work for Tenebrix, actually, it's just that we can't compare hashrates on a 1:1 basis since a good hashrate for TBX is still in KH/s. Even though it's GPU-hostile we could compile for OpenCL anyway, pick a stock "reference card" (I vote for the venerable 5830) and run all the miners on that card to find their hashrates. If we did it this way then we could use Profit per 5830 per day as a metric. – David Perry – 2011-10-10T16:07:05.023