8
1
Bitcoin utilizes a proof-of-work mechanism to assure against double-spending, as well as providing an example opensource implementation. However, some countries allow software patents, which could mean that one person/company has the ability to suddenly prevent the legal use of Satoshi Nakamoto's Bitcoin algorithms.
Are these Bitcoin algorithms complex enough to qualify for being patentable, and if so, in what countries might such patents be granted? Does this pose a significant legal risk for users of Bitcoin?
1Given that there are a few details such as known public key for Satoshi, couldn't he/she prove invention and thus patent it? While given the little we know about Satoshi, it seems unlikely; what if for some reason Satoshi decided the whole thing had not turned out as desired and wished to reign it in? Also, Satoshi may have unknowingly infringed some patents. It seems relevant to the question to ask 'what could such a patent holder do'? – Julian Noble – 2011-09-15T14:17:52.587
It's in no way easy to contest a patent. It's a quite expensive process. – Christian – 2013-04-12T11:43:51.743
1@JulianNoble AFAIK you have a certain grace period(a year or so) for filing a patent after publishing what you want to patent. So unless he already filed the patent, it should be too late now. – CodesInChaos – 2012-02-25T14:00:46.110